For years, Zomato was more than just a food delivery app. It positioned itself as a discovery-led food platform a place where people explored restaurants, read reviews, planned outings, and connected emotionally with dining. Zomato stood for food culture, not just food logistics.
However, as the platform evolved and competition intensified, a noticeable shift occurred. Discounts, offers, and aggressive pricing strategies began to dominate the experience. What was once about discovering great food increasingly became about finding the cheapest deal. This shift triggered backlash from restaurants, diners, and even loyal users.
This article explores why Zomato faced criticism when discounts started replacing the dining experience, and what this phase reveals about platform economics, brand identity, and customer trust without assigning blame or defaming the brand.
Zomato’s Original Identity- Discovery Before Delivery
In its early years, Zomato’s strength lay in information and experience, not transactions.
The platform focused on-
- Restaurant discovery
- Menus, photos, and reviews
- Dining recommendations
- Food culture storytelling
Users opened Zomato not just to order food, but to decide where to eat. Restaurants benefited from visibility, and diners felt informed and confident. The relationship was balanced- Zomato connected people to food experiences, not just discounts.
This positioning created emotional trust. Zomato felt like a guide, not a salesman.
The Shift- When Discounts Became the Main Attraction
As competition in food delivery increased and user acquisition costs rose, Zomato leaned heavily into discount-driven growth.
The app experience gradually changed-
- Home screens highlighted offers before restaurants
- Sorting prioritized “lowest price” and “highest discount”
- Promotions became more prominent than food quality or ambience
- Dining-out features were increasingly tied to deals rather than discovery
Discounts were no longer an incentive they became the core reason to open the app.
This shift delivered short-term gains in traffic and orders, but it came with long-term consequences.
Why the Backlash Began
The backlash Zomato faced did not stem from discounts themselves it stemmed from what discounts replaced.
1. Dining Became Transactional, Not Experiential
Dining is inherently experiential. It involves-
- Ambience
- Service
- Taste consistency
- Social moments
When discounts dominate decision-making, dining becomes a price-based transaction. Customers stop asking-
“Is this restaurant good?”
And start asking-
“Is this the cheapest option right now?”
This shift eroded the emotional side of dining that Zomato once championed.
2. Restaurants Felt Devalued
Many restaurant partners expressed concern that heavy discounting-
- Trained customers to expect lower prices
- Reduced perceived value of their food
- Compressed already thin margins
- Attracted deal-seekers rather than loyal diners
Instead of being chosen for quality or uniqueness, restaurants felt chosen or ignored based on discount percentage alone.
For many, this felt less like partnership and more like price erosion.
3. Customer Trust Began to Shift
Users gradually noticed inconsistencies-
- Restaurants looked attractive online but disappointed offline
- Dining experiences didn’t always match the “deal-driven hype”
- Popularity metrics felt skewed by discounts rather than merit
As a result, reviews and ratings felt less reliable. The platform’s role as a trusted guide weakened when pricing overshadowed quality cues.
The Psychology of Discounts- Short-Term Gain, Long-Term Cost
Discounts are powerful but dangerous when overused.
They-
- Drive quick decisions
- Increase frequency temporarily
- Lower resistance to trying new places
But they also-
- Reduce brand loyalty
- Train users to wait for offers
- Make full-price dining feel “expensive” or unfair
When discounts become constant, they stop feeling special and start feeling mandatory.
For a platform built on discovery and trust, this shift created friction.
From Food Culture to Food Arbitrage
At its best, Zomato was about food culture stories, curation, and choice.
During its discount-heavy phase, it began to feel more like food arbitrage–
- Who offers the best deal today?
- Which restaurant is subsidized right now?
- What’s cheapest within a radius?
This wasn’t inherently wrong but it was misaligned with the brand’s original emotional promise.
Impact on the Dining-Out Experience
Dining out through discount lenses changed customer behavior-
- Guests prioritized savings over experience
- Restaurants faced unpredictable footfall spikes
- Service quality sometimes suffered under volume pressure
- Expectations became mismatched with reality
This created a loop where-
- Customers felt underwhelmed
- Restaurants felt exploited
- The platform absorbed criticism from both sides
Zomato’s Learning Curve- Rebalancing the Model
Over time, Zomato began recognizing the limits of discount-led growth.
Steps toward rebalancing included-
- Greater emphasis on curated dining programs
- Reduced blanket discounting
- Highlighting experience-driven listings
- Encouraging value, not just price
These changes reflected an important realization-
Platforms don’t just move food they shape behavior.
The Larger Lesson for Platform Businesses
Zomato’s experience offers a broader insight relevant to all digital marketplaces-
- When price becomes the primary filter, experience suffers
- Discounts should amplify value, not replace it
- Trust is harder to rebuild than traffic
- Curation beats commoditization in the long run
Growth driven purely by incentives is fragile. Growth driven by experience is resilient.
Conclusion
Zomato did not face backlash because it offered discounts.0
It faced backlash because discounts slowly overshadowed dining itself.
When a platform known for food discovery becomes known mainly for deals, it risks losing the emotional connection that built loyalty in the first place.
The key takeaway is simple but powerful-
People don’t remember how much they saved.
They remember how the experience made them feel.
For Zomato and for any experience-led brand the future lies not in removing discounts, but in putting them back in their place– as a support system, not the main story.
About the Author
